Not surprising but still a bit sad
In case the news didn't make it all the way to California, the Dallas Stars will now only have one beat writer (the esteemable Mike Heika) covering the team in two major DFW newspapers. Apparently, this isn't just a typical shot at hockey though: the cutdown will affect other major sports as well.
(At this point the Cowboys might have more coverage than every sport combined ... times three instead of two.)
Mirtle points to the great success of Mark Stepneski as one of the tettale reasons for this change (although he does do so in a somewhat tongue-in-cheek fashion). This story is interesting in a few ways.
As a journalism major during my non-BoC time, it's been disturbing to watch the newspaper industry fold like an accordion during the last few years. There was always some writing on the wall: it's hard to forget the cricket chirping silence registered during an opinion writing class when I predicted that print newspapers would be gone in 20 years. Other aspiring journalists/lazy listless bastards did not appreciate my newspaper-to-railroad comparisons, either.
But under that layer of snark there was at least an undercurrent of sadness.
Anyway, I wonder how this drop in coverage will affect how the Stars interact with bloggers. While writing a term paper regarding blogging taking the place of mainstream hockey coverage* a couple years ago, I learned that the Stars organization was not yet interested in providing press passes to bloggers.
At this point, in this economy, how could any NHL team be foolish enough to look past such a cheap way to generate interest? While my job would make it difficult to go to every game, I would absolutely go to as many Stars games as possible if they adopted an Islanders/Capitals style blogger box system.
So who knows ... perhaps BoC will have a Stars press box presence one of these days. Might have to direct their attention away from state fornication cartoons, though ...
* In case you ever wondered how much of a hockey nerd I am ...
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
It is definitely unfortunate.
I really enjoyed Tracy Meyers’ coverage of the team. What is even more frustrating is that even though both newspapers are combining the coverage, they are still cutting down on the overall amount of space the Stars get in the DMN.
After spending the past few years covering the Cowboys my eyes have been opened to how lopsided things truly are. The Stars are in the middle of the season and have trouble making the front page yet the Cowboys dominate sports news in Dallas. That’s just a point we’ve all gotten used to in Dallas. What’s more disturbing is the amount of unresearched opinion pieces that are spewed out now by guys who have trouble covering the Cowboys.
Hopefully The Stars will realize that there are a few bloggers out there that are worthy of access to the team. With the newspapers cutting down on coverage one would assume they would look to expand coverage in other places, such as popular websites and blogs.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Jan 19, 2009 8:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Very much with you on the “undercurrent of sadness” mixed with the snark. It’s like watching grandpa not be able to do what he used to love to do: What he did in his day was great, things are just different now.
Lighthouse Hockey: an SB Nation New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Jan 19, 2009 10:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The only thing that reduces some of that empathy is the way the MSM puts its nose up at blogs. Sure, there’s some flaws to blogging – it’s something of Wild West compared to the highly structured journalism industry – but journalists have their fair share of ethical downfalls themselves. Just rent “Shattered Glass” and you’ll see an example (also, you’ll see Darth freaking Vader. I’m not that big of a SW fan but even I was offended by that casting choice).
It would be nice if the mainstreamers realized that there’s more to the blogosphere than Deadspin’s tomfoolery.
(Though I typically enjoy their tomfoolery.)
by jamestobrien on Jan 19, 2009 11:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah, definitely. I just try to look at any media, on- or off-line, on its own merit. My undercurrent of sadness is allmost purely self-interested: As in, morning coffee and a paper, and (later) the newspaper on the throne, will always hold a place in my heart.
Lighthouse Hockey: an SB Nation New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Jan 19, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
An independent press is one of those Societal Goods that needs defending. But there’s nothing about that concept that says that the press must be in newsprint format, supported by print advertising and classified ads.
Doing real journalism is hard, and requires resources for things like fact-checking, source verification, and extended investigative reporting. Anyone who’s been paying attention to, say, the political coverage by the media over the last decade will note that they’ve flubbed it like a Jeff Friesen breakaway. Blogs and online journals that can provide solid journalism will rise to the top, filling the niche that newspapers (and sections of newspapers) used to provide. And the vast ocean of knee-jerk opinion + cat pictures will hopefully gradually subside.
by ievans on Jan 19, 2009 1:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This seems all but inevitable.
Although, if you ask any weathered journalist, they’d tell you that the masses love a good dog/cat story.
by jamestobrien on Jan 19, 2009 2:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. My biggest concern is the drop in budget for investigative journalism, but that was a) already dropping before the interwebs got real big-like, and b) subsided based on other revenue sources anyway.
But my god, don’t let them take away the cat pictures! :P
Lighthouse Hockey: an SB Nation New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Jan 19, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was sad to see those investigative pieces go and other “feature” style stories become something that’s more of an afterthought on Web sites. Strange times.
by jamestobrien on Jan 19, 2009 7:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


























