Season Review: Rounding Out the Duck Forwards

Forward Summer Sauce: The ingredients are all in place, time to get mixing!
Throughout the late part of this summer, I've been running individual "Season Review" posts for Ducks forwards, and I think I've mostly covered the big players in earlier posts -- Getzlaf, Perry, Ryan, Selanne & Koivu, and Lupul figure to provide the Ducks a lot of firepower; Marchant for sure will be a staple on the stopping end, and on the other end Ebbett faces battle to re-establish himself in the regular lineup. As for the rest?
Well, now that it's September I've gone the lazy path and lumped the rest of the Ducks forwards in one quick-and-dirty post, with each player getting a couple paragraphs apiece. It's somewhat by design -- none of these players is scheduled to make more than a million dollars next year, and I'm not sure any of them should be considered "critical" to Anaheim's success in the short term. I've also included a graphic for each player, though I'll warn you -- at times I went the lazy route (or as we should probably start calling it, the "Sleek Method") -- I've re-used some pics for some and cut corners with some bad puns on others.
I should mention -- so far, the focus on the forwards has been very positive, and it looks to be Anaheim's strength this season. Don't worry, though. Now that the forwards are finished, it'll be time to move on to the Ducks' question marks soon enough. So take a quick jaunt with me as we go over six Anaheim depth forwards (not in any meaningful order), after "le jump".
I've had trouble coming up with a nickname that will stick for Nokelainen -- when speaking, I'll most often use "Nickelodeon", but even that's tough to turn into an image, so for purposes of this post I've instead used a picture of Gleek, the blue-space-monkey-pal who accompanied the Wonder Twins back in the Justice League days.
To me, that could represent Nokelainen's opportunity -- the fact that he is the only other Finn on the roster alongside Selanne and Koivu (plus the facts that Nokelainen backchecks and Lupul doesn't) could squeeze him onto the second line with the Wonder Finns. Don't forget in the playoffs, when Carlyle had overtaxed Getzlaf, that he inserted Nokelainen in on the top line, and per recollection it looked pretty good -- even though he's more Marchant than Getzlaf, Nickelodeon can look good alongside some scorers, I think, and an artificial promotion would help spread scoring even further. Of course, this all comes with only 26 GP in a Ducks uniform (acquired at the deadline for Steve Montador), so definitely more viewing time is required.
Even though Nickelodeon probably won't be in the top six, I think by virtue of his penalty killing he'll be a fixture in the lineup. So far he's proven a responsible player with some skill, and there's definitely room to grow. Good deadline pick-up by Barstool Bob.
For Mike Brown I'll just stick with the image I created during last year's playoffs, when I was busy defending Brown's hockey existence against a sea of pitchforked Red Wings fans. To tell the truth, I'm as shocked as anybody at the usefulness of Mike Brown, especially considering the circumstances under which he was acquired (warning: going off memory here, mileage may vary).
You see, the Ducks had swiped a defenseman named Nathan McIver off waivers in Vancouver early last season to play temporarily alongside Chris Pronger (back when everybody was getting an audition to become the next O'Donnell). He was a costless acquisition, but once he had served his big-league usefulness, the Ducks put him back on waivers to send him down to Iowa. Theoretically during that day-or-so waiver period, any team in the league (including Vancouver) could have snatched McIver for free, but nobody did so.
But McIver never made it to the Iowa Chops; instead during his flight over he was traded straight-up for Mike Brown, and immediately I had to believe the worst about Brown. "So Vancouver, who 24 hours ago could have had Nathan McIver for FREE, instead decided to toss in Mike Brown instead?! That guy must be worth less than nothing!" Fortunately, that wasn't the case, though -- I don't really know what Vancouver was up to (protecting waiver position? or does that only matter in fantasy hockey?). Mike Brown has proved a very useful banger for the Ducks, and will be a prominent shut-down forward, possibly on Marchant's wing.
Image re-used from an old Blogger post, back when Carter sported #52. Ryan Carter has had an up-and-down career for Anaheim thus far, but I have high hopes for his future -- he's always struck me as a down-the-road replacement for Sammy Pahlsson. He's got great speed and tenacity, and while his size is a bit underwhelming, few guys work harder on their shifts. Plus, like Pahlsson, he is capable of popping an odd goal every now and again -- he had one in each of the Ducks' playoff rounds, at least.
Of course, a lot of Carter's play this season depends on Carlyle's trust -- it's tough to see Carter usurping Marchant for the key shutdown minutes in the near future, but that's probably ideal for now. Carter will probably get some fourth-line minutes and secondary penalty killing time (which has mostly been his bread-and-butter thus far), and can work his way into more key situations over the course of the next two seasons.
One nice asset I'll add about Carter: the guy can backcheck for two -- that's why I think he became about the only Duck who played decently with Lazybags Bertuzzi. If it turns out that some winger doesn't put in a legitimate effort on defense (for some reason I'm looking squarely at you Lupul, but Selanne may qualify also), it may not be a bad short-term fix to let Carter watch their backs -- I think he's much more comfortable playing defensive conscience than leading the offensive charge, anyways.
Another Duck I'm struggling to find a suitable nickname for, though when watching a game I can't help but call Christensen "Fake Pahlsson", because of his deceptive #26. It's actually a calming mind-trick -- for a split second I stop worrying and assume quickly that Pahlsson's there to save the day, before quickly re-realizing that those days are long gone.
But just like "Nickelodeon", "Fake Pahlsson" just doesn't make for a good sight gag. Instead for today's post, I just threw in a picture of a much more famous Eric C., in the midst of one of his "screw you guys, I'm going home" moments. One thing I like about Christensen so far was his response to not getting a qualifying offer this summer from the Ducks. He could have run off as a suddenly-UFA with a pretty legit "screw you guys", but instead re-upped with Anaheim for his old salary early on July 1st -- he never even shopped around.
That's not to say that Christensen would have been a hot commodity or anything -- probably it was a good move for the young forward to ensure a job for next year -- but I think it shows some determination to prove himself, now that he's already on his third team. As for his skillset, Christensen is definitely a puck magician and a slick passer, and it could be that he and Andrew Ebbett face a similar struggle -- seemingly built to play in the top six but not enough room on the scoring lines. It's possible that Ebbett and Christensen compete with each other for a roster spot this coming year -- it's not a bad thing to have one skilled guy on the fourth line, but their lack of PK experience probably prevents both of them playing.
This picture was too perfect, no doctoring even necessary.
I really should have put together a separate post about George Parros -- his contributions to the team are on somewhat a different plane than the rest of these forwards, and extend well past his on-ice presence. The guy is a flat-out hero in Anaheim, whether well-deserved or not -- SoCal hockey fans like their moustached fighters.
I don't really even know if Parros is a great fighter, though his skating balance has improved dramatically since he first showed up in Anaheim. To me, I'm not even sure if "great fighter" is a necessity for Parros -- the fact that he's willing to take any antagonist off the ice for five minutes is usually good enough for me. No, I'm a numbers guy -- for me, I judge a fighter based on what they do between fights, and that's why Parros' start last year had me in shock.
Consider this -- in his first 27 games last season, George Parros had 8 points and was a +10! That didn't last, though -- over his final 54 games, Parros only had 2 points and was a -2. Still, at least the Moustache was able to demonstrate some surprisingly decent hockey play, and if that continues he'll be a valuable Duck for sure.
Overall, I don't care terribly if Parros gets outscored a bit -- his minutes are sufficiently controlled that it won't be a huge impact. His contribution goes outside of that -- he can sell plastic moustaches for charity, be a popular face on a billboard, and most importantly, get the bloodthirsty Anaheim crowd into a game. That's a great role for Parros, glad to have him aboard.
Last but certainly not least (though "least known" does apply, I have yet to see this guy play) is Artoo, the trade return for Miller Lite. All I really know about this guy is that (a) he's Russian, (b) he's big, (c) he gets a lot of penalty minutes, and (d) he seems popular amongst Lightning fans -- perhaps they share in Anaheim's bloodlust.
So it's definitely more imagination than anything, but I'm kind of hopeful for Artyukhin's possibilities on offense -- he seemingly is built as a cycle-the-boards machine, and has scored decently on my XBox. If there's a way that Artoo could model his game around that of Todd Fedoruk, possibly even with Getzlaf and Perry (hopefully without dragging their numbers down too far), that would make the offense incredibly deep.
I know I should be keeping my expectations low for a guy I've yet to see play, but I guess that's really the beauty of the Anaheim forward possibilities -- it seems a ripe environment for a hitter to thrive, and here's hoping that Artyukhin brings that element with him to Anaheim.
That wraps up the forward portion of this "Season Review" series, and I've profiled 14 different players that will ultimately fill 12 forward spots. When healthy, I think we can safely put Getzlaf, Perry, Ryan, Selanne, Koivu, Lupul, and Marchant as roster locks, which leaves five spots for seven players to compete for (the six profiled here plus Ebbett). Question for the comments: Out of that set, who would be your two scratches on a full-health night?
As I said before "le jump", forward depth definitely looks to be the strength of the Ducks this coming season -- whenever there's loads of spreadable talent and competition for roster spots, it usually results in success. I think it's critical for the Ducks that it doesn't take too long for the forward lines to click, though, because as we'll see in my next post, there's going to be a lot to make up for on the newly-crafted blueline. Should be an adventure -- can't wait for it to get underway.
Go Ducks.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Related: Wyshynski at Puck Daddy starts his 30 teams in 30 days preview feature today with the Anaheim Ducks, including a short preview quote from me. Hooray for alphabetical firstness!
http://www.battleofcali.com/
yea parros deserved his own posts…..shit his mustache deserves its own post
i was telling sk..this has to be outside of the first pronger-nieds year one of the most intriguing ducks teams i can remember..
it could be special if players play like there suppose to…or old age might catch up to selanne and koivu
curios to see artoo
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 1, 2009 11:10 AM PDT reply actions
Weird reading this as your name pops up!
I, for the most part, am feeling way to comfortable about this season already. I’m afraid of that whole, “looks good on paper” deal that we had last season slapping us in the face again.
But I’ll be dammed, even the guys mentioned above make me feel confident…to confident perhaps.
GO DUCKS!!!
DUCKSandPUCKS.com
SKeleven on Twitter
I’m afraid of that whole, "looks good on paper" deal that we had last season slapping us in the face again.
I guess that’s reasonable, but it definitely beats the alternative of looking bad on paper and hoping for a long series of illogical upsets.
And be careful talking about disappointment — Sharks fans read here, too.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
tee-hee
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 1, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
but it definitely beats the alternative of looking bad on paper and hoping for a long series of illogical upsets.
That is definitely an upside! :)
Oh, I wans’t disappointed about the end of the season…it was the beginning that was hard to swallow! So, um, sorry Sharks fans?
GO DUCKS!!!
DUCKSandPUCKS.com
SKeleven on Twitter
I, for the most part, am feeling way to comfortable about this season already. I’m afraid of that whole, "looks good on paper" deal that we had last season slapping us in the face again.
If it makes you feel better, I think the Ducks got worse, and I can’t understand how Earl and Anaheim Calling seem to think otherwise, or at least, have a “wait and see” approach to it.
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
Any time you give up a guy like Pronger it’s risky business, sure. I was an interview with Bob Murray yesterday and he said the reason the Ducks lost to the Red Wings is they didn’t have enough offensive power to put pressure on them. And his off-season moves at least appear to solve that problem. Defense and goaltending are blurrier, but both have good potential to do well. Hence the generally positive outlook.
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
Though if someone decides to be the new B-Mo… then, well, shit.
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
dont say that pleeeeeease
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 2, 2009 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t say that I think the Ducks got better across the board. I don’t compare this team to the Stanley Cup team as much as I compare them to the team that signed Bertuzzi and Schneider. Instead of being a team desperately trying to keep that Stanley Cup window open, this is a squad that seems intent on opening a new one.
Murray’s turned rebuilding into a transition game. There are definitely Cup pieces this year, but I’m more excited about what the Ducks have in place after the AARPers leave next year. Pick up Duncan Keith, and we’d have a young disciplined team that could contend for a few years. Then we’d just be one AARPer away from being a Cup team.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 1, 2009 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I think the Ducks got worse, and I can’t understand how Earl and Anaheim Calling seem to think otherwise
Worse than what? Worse than eighth-seed? Or worse than some mythical standings record you think last year’s team “should have” achieved?
Besides, I think I’ve been clear — the improvement in the forwards has a tradeoff when I get to the blueline. As for its net effect, I don’t have much problem with a “wait and see” approach. Could go either way. There were better and worse teams than Anaheim last year, and none of them had Pronger either.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
Well yeah, worse than the mythical standings record I think last year’s team should have achieved. So imaginary worse, I guess.
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
yea parros deserved his own posts…..shit his mustache deserves its own post
If you think I shortchanged the depth forwards, just wait until I get to the blueline. I haven’t finalized anything, but it’s quite possible I have one post for Niedermayer and then one lump-post for everyone else. Everyone in that group seems too new to properly profile.
Shit, I’d better start image-gathering.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
it could go either way but one way it isnt gonna go is have a season like colorado last year…i think even the naysayers would agree on that…u have getzlaf almost at his prime..perry right behind him…and bobby ryan..teemu…even if scotty shows his age…our d although not stellar are at best average…and 2 good goaltenders
the theory that where gonna fall apart without pronger (pronger curse aside) is bullshit
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 2, 2009 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions
On the scratch question, I’ll say Parros because, depending on the opponent, you can often scratch Georgie. Then I’d probably scratch Carter. That sweet saucer pass Christensen made to Ryan last year keeps fake pahlsson in the lineup for me as an offensive possibility, but maybe I’m just goal-hungry after last year.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 1, 2009 11:13 AM PDT reply actions
Yeah, but I’m not sure that Parros is an easy scratch at home — he’s so damn popular and crowd-inciting that I think he gets some at-bats there whether he deserves them or not.
Then again, maybe if I was the Ducks’ PR guy, the best strategy might be to open up a photo booth with Parros in one of the concourses — he’d still be worth the paycheck doing stuff like that.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
Well Parros played almost a full season last year. He isn’t the cat nip laden scratching post he once was. And you’re right that he’s probably guaranteed the home games. But I think on a healthy night, against most opponents, I’d think versatility. Well, versatility or that awesome saucer pass— it’s hard to sensationalize a video replay of versatility.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 1, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions
My scratches would be Parros (cause there are plenty of other guys capable of dropping the gloves if necessary) and probably Ebbett, if he’s included in this. I guess because of size…
GO DUCKS!!!
DUCKSandPUCKS.com
SKeleven on Twitter
Reader-submitted excellence
Reader Julian did the legwork I was too lazy to get done myself. Awesome.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
Hey, at least that’s probably more publicly wearable on a t-shirt than the (still awesome) “Heil Hiller” shirt that Chen made me.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
OOH IM gonna get that t-shirt made
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 1, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions
“once he pops, you just really, really want him to stop”
hooked on quack
by tu madre on Sep 1, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Earl...
I was checking out the AHL website and noticed that the Ducks don’t seem to have an affiliate…what are the plans for their high level prospects? Are they planning to get an AHL affiliate at some point?
what we heard..they are gonna spread them around
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 2, 2009 8:13 AM PDT up reply actions
That’s all true, but I’m no minor league expert. The Iowa Chops didn’t make their revenue quota or something, so then the Ducks cut ties (then subsequently something else silly happened to Iowa’s books, but we were out of the picture by then). So we’re without, similar to what the Dallas Stars had last year.
Per my very loose understanding, the Ducks can get permission from other AHL clubs to play their minor leaguers, but it’s generally not thought to be optimal — no team will be grooming our goalies, for example.
This really is a better question for Arthur or somebody who has the AHL on their radar. I don’t mind not having an affiliate for this year, but hopefully it gets remedied in the near future.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
I’m going to take that as Earl throwing it to me. :-)
The Des Moines Register said that the Iowa owners put the team up as collateral, which is against AHL rules, in some failed business dealing. They tried to offer the Ducks installments of the money owed, but Anaheim, understandably, walked away.
Murray announced our main AHL team will be the San Antonio Rampage, Phoenix’s affiliate. I’m not sure about their offense/defense/special teams systems, but I hope the Ducks chose them for a reason. Presumably, they’ll get a lot of the guys we will want to call up or monitor closely. As Earl said, the goalie situation is tough, but David McNab said he’s confident (not sure why) that they will find a place (they hadn’t yet) for Pogge to “play plenty.” We’ll have the same ECHL partnership in Bakersfield.
As far as finding a new affiliate, I believe Iowa’s changing ownership, though I haven’t followed the situation. But more interestingly, there was news that the Ducks renewed talks (which they started last March) in San Diego for the possibility of an AHL affiliate down south. They’re talking with Hahn, the former Gulls owner. Supposedly, that could happen as early as next year.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 2, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry, “next” being the 2010-11 season. I don’t know anything about the process of adding/deleting teams to the AHL, but Hahn was confident it could get done by then.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 2, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions
?
why isnt the duck drinking like usual? i guess it is the offseason
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 2, 2009 9:16 AM PDT reply actions
Besides, shouldn’t cooks always be a little tipsy? Maybe there’s a bottle hidden under the desk or something.
yea the minimum looks like he could use a strong drink to calm down a bit
puck daddy said corey perry is hated by sharks fans…hehe
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 2, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions
im not sure what that means?
ill assume hes stirring jungle juice…although its not that hard to make so he shouldnt be sweating or stressed out so to speak
Put those cookies back..Mutha fucka!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Sep 2, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





























