Drinky Post: In Defense of Mark Whicker

First disclaimer: I've been drinking.  Not a ton, but enough.

Second disclaimer: I only decided to write this post tonight -- I should probably research and link, but then I wouldn't have the courage to write this at all.  Do your own web research on this one; I'm running this post linkless.

Third disclaimer: I don't follow the "real" news one bit -- I'm way more ignorant about whatever kidnapping happened than probably any of you.

Now, properly disclaimered, let's begin:

Item the first: Mark Whicker is an OC Register sports columnist who wrote a despicable piece -- what in essence was a "Let's measure 18 years by chronicling OC sports history" column was derailed by its horrific premise -- the column was directed towards a kidnap / rape / mindfuck victim that had recently shown up in the news.

There's so many problems with the intro to the article that I really can't go through them all -- the internet has already done a lot of that for me.  The fact that I was shocked has to say something -- hell, I read Rudy Kelly all the damn time -- Whicker attempted a punchline that was beyond disastrous.  Hell, it could be career-ending.

And I've got nothing against sympathy for kidnap victims nor against outrage at insensitivity -- everybody who writes in a public forum should get a grasp on what you can write about and more importantly, what you CANNOT write about.  Whicker had no such grasp on this one -- it's obvious from his stupid article and it's obvious from his even-more-stupid retraction (which may have hinted at regret).

Fucking Whicker was wrong -- I get it, you get it, everybody but Whicker gets it. 

Item the second: Mark Whicker is an OC Register sports columnist that I've somewhat grown up with -- now those of you who know me can attest I don't follow any sport well except hockey; I'm very blind to what happens in other sports.  But, for more than half my life, I have been an OC Register subscriber, and still am today -- I got my Whicker shock in print, not online. 

And I know Mark Whicker -- not that I read him terribly, as he has a fascination with "popular" sports, but I've seen his face on the front page of the OC Register sports section forever.  He's a staple -- I've never known an OC Register without his commentary.  And he is, to the best of my knowledge, a sports-roundup guy.  He'll touch on all the big sports stories in SoCal -- of course focusing on the favorites (Lakers + college football), but he makes his rounds.  And as such, he's developed a voice of the observer -- he provides cheap commentary to what happens in SoCal sports.

And that's almost the issue -- if you look at what has been termed the "Worst Sports Article Ever" (I'm misquoting), if you ignore the awful-joke premise, there's actually a lot of content in there -- this guy is pulling from a lot of sports to tell what has turned out to be the worst joke in printed media.  Here's a guy, one I have to think is awfully rare, who can sort through 18 years of assorted sports history and pull together a tapestry of the sports landscape, one that otherwise would appeal to Joe SoCal SportsFan.  Ignoring the brutal premise, it's actually a pretty insightful piece -- I wouldn't have the wherewithal nor the perspective to be able to construct it myself.

In fact -- aside from the terrible joke, it's actually a valuable piece from a valuable perspective -- a guy who's seen and covered and experienced it all, recounting his collected memories in the worst setting ever.

Item the Third: There really is no third item, but here's the question -- how bad should we crucify a good sports guy for a joke gone terribly sour?  Is it over for Whicker -- can we really not find forgiveness for this guy?

I mean, I don't vouch for him that well -- I don't know him much more than his byline photo, but seriously -- the guy fucks up one joke, and it's off to the unemployment line?  I don't know -- it's definitely possible I'm misreading the tea leaves here, and perhaps all I've been reading is angry comments from people reading Mark Whicker for the first time.

But here's the thing -- if the OC Register is interested in having a sportswriter with a handle on sports history in SoCal, one who can bring a lot of that history together, and one who can write to the SoCal sports fan, I don't think they'll ever find one more suited to the task than Mark Whicker.  I mean, we'll probably see the guy fired, but isn't that my loss?  Aren't I about to lose a valuable and unique voice because of some stupid joke?

Yeah, newspapers are dying, and probably, Mark Whicker's out of a job soon anyways -- but that's not my drinky point tonight.  I guess my real problem is seeing what outrage can occur from one joke-gone-bad.  Twenty years gets pushed out the door in a second -- and that's tough to watch.

Mark Whicker is not a bad guy.  Well, probably he's not.  He got caught in a bad moment by a Twitter-machine designed to prey upon bad moments.  He fucked up, and it's going to cost him.  And it depresses me.

Why?  Well, I'm a guy who makes bad jokes on the web.  It has to be an inevitability that at some point, if I write long enough (and drunk enough), I'm bound to cross some stupid line -- I'll make the joke that nobody in their right mind makes.  It will be horrible, it will be public, and it will demonstrate some inherent flaw in my moral code.  I suspect someday I'll be the web's latest "Whicker-bitch", and whatever credibility I've mustered (admittedly, very little -- I'm still using a fake name) will get thrown out the door like yesterday's newspaper.

(See?  "Yesterday's Newspaper" is a fucking horrible joke that only vaguely incorporates the relevant issues.)

Item the Fourth: In closing, I'll say this -- I think we all need to show a little more forgiveness to Mark Whicker -- not even because he deserves it so much as someday I'll deserve it.  Fucking up is a part of the writing process, whether you're a rookie or a veteran, and no matter how deep-end one article goes -- what matters is his larger body of work, not the worst example available. 

Mark Whicker, I'm only one subscriber that only half-reads your articles, but you are still welcome in my newspaper.  No more jokes about pervert-current-events, please, but for sure I'll take the seen-it-all-in-SoCal insight.  I can definitely sympathize with a joke-gone-sour, dude, because some day I'll overstep that line, too.

Hope you'll forgive me then, too.

Feel free to offer your comments, drinky or not.  Sobriety starts tomorrow!

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Battle of California

You must be a member of Battle of California to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Battle of California. You should read them.

Join Battle of California

You must be a member of Battle of California to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Battle of California. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.