SB Nation NHL Preview: Your 2009-10 Anaheim Ducks
Hello, BoC readers and visitors! Today begins a 15-day gauntlet of season previews from all across our SBN hockey megaplex. Each day one eastern conference team and one western conference team will be profiled by team bloggers, and since we're sticking with the time-tested tradition of alphabetical order, our Atlanta Thrashers site -- Bird Watchers Anonymous -- and our Anaheim Ducks guy -- yours truly, until Anaheim Calling gets its act together -- get today's inaugural honors. A warning to regular BoC readers: this preview is intended for a wider audience than usual, so be prepared -- for purposes of this post, I'll probably use more traditional language -- "Getzlaf" instead of "Baldy" and "San Jose Sharks" instead of "Chokers up north". Enjoy!
2008-09 Season Recap: The Ducks' season was one of prolonged mediocrity for the first 69 games of the schedule -- through mid-March, seemingly every bit of good luck was countered by an equally bad one. Bobby Ryan was top notch, but Brendan Morrison couldn't get his act together. Jonas Hiller emerged as a top netminder, but J.S. Giguere turned awful. The power play was a deadly weapon, but the penalty kill was a disaster. The Ducks scored 3 goals regularly but typically allowed 4. Through Game 69, the Ducks sat one game above .500 and looked frustratingly out of a playoff spot. Longtime Ducks Chris Kunitz, Sammy Pahlsson, Travis Moen, and Kent Huskins were all shipped out via trade, and the Ducks began retooling for the future.
However, when Anaheim's back was squarely against the wall, the Ducks flipped on a magic "urgency" switch and began winning with regularity -- they ended the season with a whopping 10-2-1 record which was somewhat illusory (the Ducks blew four 3rd period leads in the stretch but won all four in OT/SO) yet effective. With a 2 point margin, the Ducks snagged the 8th playoff spot on the last day of the season, and prepared to meet their doom at the hands of the Presidents' Trophy Chokers up no San Jose Sharks -- a team with plenty to prove in the postseason.
It was, of course, a long-awaited series for this blog, a postseason Battle of California that finally featured modern-day franchises. And of course it was an awesome result -- not every franchise gets the sweet opportunity to end Jeremy Roenick's career. The Ducks upset the Sharks in six games, and even pushed the 2nd-seeded Red Wings to a tight game seven before folding. The Ducks proved one lesson: regular season success does matter; it is really tough to keep winning as an 8th seed, because you're guaranteed a steady dose of top opposition.
The 2008-09 season was also the closing chapter for a couple notable eras in Anaheim -- longtime general manager Brian Burke, after spending all the money he could in Anaheim, left the Ducks in November to take a higher-spending position in Toronto, leaving Bob Murray at the helm. Also, it became the final season for Chris Pronger in Anaheim; three years after his acquisition, the Ducks traded the opposition-despised defenseman to the Flyers, which seems fitting -- in Philadelphia, a substandard moral code is usually rewarded by a hearty pat on the back.
In fact, now that the dust has settled from all the offseason activity, the Ducks have only eight players left from their Stanley Cup team two summers ago -- Giguere, S. Niedermayer, Selanne, Marchant, Getzlaf, Perry, Carter, and Parros. It's certainly a lot of roster turnover, but it also reflects the salary cap realities of a mid-market team with success; Burke built an expiring roster structure that left his successor with plenty of flexibility -- one aspect I really respect him for. And while many former Ducks have turned their cup success into valuable paydays elsewhere, GM Murray has filled out the roster with affordable talent that can hopefully keep the Ducks playoff-bound while readjusting the franchise to its proper mid-market spending budget.
Who's In: Saku Koivu (C, UFA-MTL), Joffrey Lupul (RW, trade-PHI), Luca Sbisa (D, trade-PHI), Nick Boynton (D, UFA-FLA), Evgeny Artyukhin (RW, trade-TBL), Steve Eminger (D, UFA-FLA), Steve McCarthy (D, UFA-KHL), Justin Pogge (G, trade-TOR)
Who's Out: Chris Pronger (D, trade-PHI), Francois Beauchemin (D, UFA-TOR), Drew Miller (LW, trade-TBL), Bret Hedican (D, retirement), Rob Niedermayer (RW, UFA)
Team strengths: Offseason additions of Saku Koivu and Joffrey Lupul should help Anaheim's forward depth considerably; during the playoffs the Ducks' offense mainly consisted of the Getzlaf-Perry-Ryan top line plus Teemu Selanne, with an odd triple-overtime goal by Todd Marchant sprinkled in for effect. That top line was fantastic, though -- over their final 26 games (the 13-game stretch run plus the two rounds of the playoffs), the trio combined for 39 goals and 48 assists, always in must-win situations and often against top-line opposition.
Against the Red Wings in Round 2, however, the Ducks were overcome by Detroit's ability to roll multiple scoring lines vs. Anaheim's ability to essentially roll one. The hope is that by fortifying the forward roster, the Ducks can imitate that pattern of offensive depth, which almost seems necessary -- they'll likely have to make up for some extra goals-against in Pronger's absence.
One other team strength is depth in net -- it's unclear right now who will emerge as Anaheim's #1 this season, though Jonas Hiller is probably the frontrunner. J.S. Giguere has been a marvelous goalie in the past, though; if he rebounds it provides the Ducks with two strong options in goal.
Team weaknesses: There's a ton of uncertainty about how the Ducks' blueline will cope with the losses of Pronger and Francois Beauchemin. Captain Niedermayer will obviously be the key -- he's played 347 games in a Ducks uniform, while the next highest defenseman, Sheldon Brookbank, has played only 42. Bob Murray has brought in quite a few useful defensemen, though -- Ryan Whitney, James Wisniewski, Nick Boynton, Luca Sbisa, and Steve Eminger all have NHL experience elsewhere -- but for three years Ducks fans have enjoyed a blueline featuring two of the game's best, a luxury that will be missed.
Quite simply, my concern is about every Ducks defenseman not named Niedermayer or not paired with Niedermayer -- the captain has proven to be quite a good babysitter for learning defensemen in the past. If the bottom four can't keep their heads above water, though, it's probably going to be a tough year in Anaheim. Plus there are loads of special teams minutes that need to be filled -- Pronger was a boost in all situations, and his absence could hurt the Ducks there, as well.
(I should also add that per my opening cartoon, another team weakness is clearly the Ducks' knack for taking too many penalties, but by now that complaint has grown stale -- these days it makes for a better cartoon than a discussion topic, I think.)
Depth Chart: (note -- with so many players new to the team, it's best not to read too much into line combinations or depth rankings; Coach Carlyle will decide those things. I should note one oddity -- the Ducks don't have any natural left wingers; all forwards are either right wings or centermen):
Forwards
| Bobby Ryan | Ryan Getzlaf | Corey Perry |
| Joffrey Lupul | Saku Koivu | Teemu Selanne |
| Andrew Ebbett | Todd Marchant | Petteri Nokelainen |
| Evgeny Artyukhin | Erik Christensen | Mike Brown |
| George Parros | Ryan Carter |
Defensemen
| Scott Niedermayer | Ryan Whitney |
| Luca Sbisa | James Wisniewski |
| Nick Boynton | Steve Eminger |
| Brendan Mikkelson | Brett Festerling |
| Sheldon Brookbank | Steve McCarthy |
Goalies
| Jonas Hiller |
| J.S. Giguere |
| Justin Pogge |
What's particularly nice about the depth chart is that there seems to be a good amount of competition for every position -- NHL-caliber players will be denied playing time this season, it appears. That's one source of hope for this year's Ducks -- they have plenty of roster options to experiment with; hopefully they can concoct a winner.
Prediction for 2009-10 season: Even though the Sharks have lost some depth, shook up their lineup, and are hugging the salary cap ceiling, they're still the reigning Presidents' Trophy winner, and will probably take the Pacific Division again. That's OK, though -- Anaheim has only taken the division title once since the lockout, but more importantly they have been the longest-surviving team from the Pacific Division in three of four post-lockout postseasons. If they can continue that trend, I'll likely be satisfied -- I can drink Shark tears all day.
On paper, the Ducks look like they have a solid enough roster to make the postseason and survive the Post-Pronger Curse, but there's still enough unknowns about the team (plus other contenders in the western conference) to say for sure -- what say you, readers? Take a stab at the poll -- c'mon, it took me sixteen separate steps to create! And feel free to leave a comment about any part of the Ducks preview -- what are you hoping to see out of the Ducks this year?
I know I can't wait; the season is nearly upon us! Go Ducks.
0 recs |
60 comments
|
Comments
Do you really think Sbisa will be in your top 4 this season? I penciled in Boynton since he had more experience. Good luck with that Eminger/McCarthy combo, you need it :)
All things Thrashers + stats: www.birdwatchersanonymous.com
by The Falconer on Sep 15, 2009 6:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Do you really think Sbisa will be in your top 4 this season?
I’m really not sure — I’d personally prefer it if the 19-year-old didn’t make the Ducks this season, at least not outright. GM Murray has indicated that if it looks like Sbisa won’t be in the top-five, then he won’t be on the big-league club.
But there’s also a theory that Sbisa would be a good fit for the Niedermayer Babysitting Agency — under Scotty’s care, he could be a young top-2, like Beauchemin once was, and Festerling was early last year. I could support that, as it would allow some more veteran players to man the bottom-four.
So if I’m guessing, I hope either that Sbisa is top-two, or he’s off the roster to start the year. And I’m kind of leaning for the latter — Getzlaf, Perry, and Ryan all spent rookie-year time in the minors, and it’s worked out well for their development and their long-term salaries, I’d say.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
problem being that as a 19-year-old (not twenty until January of next year), drafted out of the CHL, Sbisa isn’t eligible to play in the minors. So it’s back to the WHL if he doesn’t make the team…
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
by kforbes on Sep 15, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, I’m always terribly ignorant on these matters, thanks for the clarification.
Still, mainly my thought process is “NHL” vs “not yet”, and I’m not that opposed to the latter — I’m a big believer in patience for kids on entry-level deals; I hope at least the Ducks aren’t backdoor-forced to play the kid whether he’s ready or not.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe Murray implied he’d be moved in the interview Sleek’s talking about.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 15, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So that’s really the options for this kid — he has to be an NHLer at 19 or he’s out?
Maybe this Pronger deal sucks then — why no middle ground? Is Sbisa not a “traditional” prospect any more?
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure that the Sbisa scenario is being affected by the same limitations that the Kings had with Jon Bernier as a 19-year old prospect 2 years ago
2009-10 LA Kings Hockey: Where Smyt Happens!!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Sep 15, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, what happened there? Bernier hasn’t been stuck on the big club, so whatever his “out” was, that’s all I’m suggesting as an alternative — I’d just prefer it if Sbisa’s name wasn’t automatically penned into the opening night’s roster, is all.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry I didn’t elaborate further, but I think what happened was that Bernier was allowed to play under 10 games with the “big” club before the Kings had to ascertain if he would play the remainder of the season with the Kings or be returned to Canadian Major Juniors (remember his debut against the Ducks in London that year?). Because the prospects rights were still controlled by a CHL team, he could only play in the NHL or CHL. Playing in the AHL or ECHL as a 19-year prospect in this scenario is out of the question…
2009-10 LA Kings Hockey: Where Smyt Happens!!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Sep 15, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin’s referring to the standard agreement between the CHL and AHL. It protects the CHL by forcing kids to either play four years in the Major Juniors or turn 20 (the last year of CHL eligibility) during their first calendar year in the AHL. I think he’d be AHL eligible if he was a month older. Kevin will correct me if it’s a “20 by September” thing, I’m sure.
Problem is, Luca’s logged time with Philly’s AHL club (granted, only 2 games), and the vagueries of how well this is enforced have always escaped me. Just one more reason I watch NCAA hockey.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 15, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not completely sure what you’re asking, so I’ll just try to explain it a bit more in depth:
Sbisa was drafted in 2008 at the end of his CHL “17-year-old” season.
Last year (2008-09), he split time between the CHL and the NHL as part of his CHL “18-year-old” season.
This year (2009-10) coming up is his CHL “19-year-old” season.
Next year will be Sbisa’s “20-year-old” overager season.
I believe the exact cut off date is the last day of the calendar year (December 31st, 2009). So yes, if Sbisa (born January 30th) was born a month earlier, he would be considered a 20-year-old. However, right now, in the eyes of the CHL and the NHL, Sbisa is 19-years-old.
Ok, so with that under our belt, as mentioned the CHL and the NHL have an agreement on players being assigned to minor pro teams. In truth, the CHL teams have the right of first refusal of assignment, but that’s far too complicated for now. So let’s just run with the fact that any player drafted out of the CHL has to return to his CHL team if he does not make the NHL team until that player is considered to be in his 20-year-old season or has four years of CHL experience.
Now, onto the AHL experience. A CHL player is allowed to join an AHL team when their CHL season is over, even if they don’t fit the current age/experience requirements. So when Lethbridge was eliminated from the playoffs, Sbisa was able to join the Phantoms (he didn’t play in the playoffs, because of the clear-day roster and jazz, but again, let’s ignore that for the time being). In Anaheim’s past, players like Getzlaf and Ryan have also joined the Ducks AHL squad after their CHL season finished for a handful of games. Nicolas Deschamps joined Iowa for two games this spring (but he’ll have to return to the QMJHL this season unless he makes the Ducks).
One final thing, someone brought up Bernie above and said that after 10 games, the team had to decided to keep him for the rest of the year or send him back. This isn’t true. The way these entry-level contracts work is that the league gives teams a 10-game test drive, see if the kid can fit. If he doesn’t, he can be sent back and it doesn’t count as a year on his contract. So Bernier was sent back after his ten games and then when he started his pro career for good a year later, he had not used any of his three-year-entry level deal. Right now, the Kings still have two more years on Bernier’s contract (this year and the 10-11 season).
In Sbisa’s case, he stayed longer then 10 games, so regardless of what Anaheim does with him, this is going to count as year number two on Sbisa’s entry-level deal. His contract will expire at the end of the 10-11 season, just like Bernier’s.
There’s another milestone that Sbisa nearly passed for free agency eligibility. If he would have played 41 games for the Flyers, he would have been one year closer to being eligible to becoming an unrestricted free agent.
Hope this helps. It’s a little bit of a mind bend.
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
by kforbes on Sep 16, 2009 8:13 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
ugh, actually let me confirm that last bit about free agency. The threshold might have been games on the active roster, which means he passed, which means he could be a UFA when he is 25.
Also, most of what I said about AHL eligibility is for CHL players who were drafted out of the CHL only.
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
by kforbes on Sep 16, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just an update on this. It is active roster, which means he is eligible to be a UFA when he has 7 years experience, aka as early as when he is 25.
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
by kforbes on Sep 16, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, thanks for going indepth on this one — though it’s probably always going to stay out of my full grasp, good to see this one spelled out.
So there’s no issue as to when Sbisa’s next raise will be — that’s already determined, no matter what happens. What’s at issue here is (a) whether the Ducks are best served playing Sbisa top-5, and (b) what’s the alternative to NHL — clearly not the AHL, so I think it’s CHL then, right?
As to (a), it’s a trickier issue to me than “Can Sbisa hack it?” — I think it’s more a question about what sort of top-6 we could ice without relying on Sbisa. Because if that non-Sbisa option looks decent, I’d almost drop Sbisa to the CHL on the principle that his next contract probably becomes more affordable the less he proves himself in the NHL. I know I’m cold and vicious on things like this, but I know what proper incubation has done for the longer-term affordability of Getzlaf, Perry, Ryan — even though these guys had AHL options when demoted.
Don’t get me wrong, though — I’m not leaning heavily in either direction; if Sbisa makes the opening night roster, great! But I’d like to think there was at least the option considered of holding him back some — I don’t suspect long-term it will make too much an impact on the player he’ll become, but it could impact his next salary — yeah, I’m a heartless economist.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 16, 2009 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s complicated, but in the end, I think this starts to point to a decision on Sbisa being just as much motivated by business as it is by actual ability.
Most reports indicate that he was pretty much a man amongst boys when he returned to Lethbridge after spending half a year with the Flyers. So in the same aspect that you’re arguing he might not be able to hack it as a full time NHLer, I’m not sure it benefits his development to be sent to the WHL for another year.
Business wise, I would agree with some of what you’re saying about an RFA Sbisa with a year and a half of NHL experience being cheaper than an RFA Sbisa with two and half years experience, but given the fact that he is recently acquired and that Anaheim doesn’t know exactly what they have on their hands, I don’t know if that’s the best course of action, either from the business side of things or the development side of things.
Unless Sbisa is absolutely abysmal, I think he should be in Anaheim this season. I don’t think he has more to learn at the CHL level.
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
by kforbes on Sep 16, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re probably right — admittedly, I’m awfully low on the “what to expect from the kid” knowledge, and it all could be moot based on his skillset. These days, I watch an embarrassingly low amount of eastern conference hockey.
My bias isn’t so much Sbisa-specific; it’s just more a salary cap philosophy about what to do with really talented kids (the keepers). Play ‘em enough to know they’re good, but hide ’em enough to afford them.
So it is good to know the tangled web of Sbisa — that does change the equation, and sure, let’s see him in a Ducks uniform. After all, there is also the issue of Pronger optics — it’s more palatable when you can physically point to the return on a trade.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 16, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I just figured you’d correct me on when they had to turn 20. Thanks for the breakdown.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 16, 2009 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if somehow the Ducks and the Flyers could both finish bottom-five, I’d certainly have an exciting draft day 2010.
But hey, it’s America — even the bitter get votes. :)
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
grrrr!!
chokers up north?? low low low!!!!
(grumbles lots)
I’ll have you know that 30 teams get a shot at winning the Cup … only ONE wins!!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 15, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but this is SB Nation’s assigned preview format — season review was a mandated part. Unavoidable, really.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
People will always vote for the lowest option if they hate something. Look at your favorite movie on IMDB, and its Voting Breakdown. The number of 1 ratings given will be higher than combined totals for 2, 3, and 4.
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
by brokenyard on Sep 15, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strangely, 136 votes in, not one single person has cast a vote for the spot where they finished last year.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I hate the Ducks...
But dang it! It should of voted 14th to make a statement!
by idunno723 on Sep 15, 2009 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frankly, 9th is the most painful — then you have a long summer and no shot at Tavares-next.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taylor Hall. Yep, already preparing.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
by RudyKelly on Sep 15, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
FINE!
I’ll do 10th because I refuse to take your advice (you’re a Ducks fan… ew)
by idunno723 on Sep 15, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good! Your hate has made you powerful.
Now, fulfill your destiny and take your father’s place at my side!
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
What is this?
Diverse psychology?! Don’t tell me what to do or not what to not do.
by idunno723 on Sep 15, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t vote 15th, before anyone accuses me of anything untoward.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
by RudyKelly on Sep 15, 2009 7:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Voted for 10th on Battle of California – 09/15/09 10:52 AM EDT
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Sep 15, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t worry — I’m not terribly sold on this notion of 30 team previews with this poll. I suspect, if readers are loyal enough, SBN should get all thirty voted into the postseason. Or at least 28 — some fanbases are very discouraged.
But good to see there’s still Duck haters out there with a strong sense of civic duty.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
James Mirtle’s take, complete with his own poll — I’m mildly interested to see how the two results stack up against each other.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here’s what I wrote at From the Rink:
The more I think about the Ducks’ defense the more excited I get. They gave up a lot of shots last year, but they didn’t give up a lot of rebounds. Losing Chris Pronger and Francois Beauchemin is going to hurt that quite a bit, I think. That, combined with the fact that Hiller gives up more rebounds than theKnicksWarriors, could end up costing the Ducks a lot of goals against.
I don’t know, I’m not seeing much reason for confidence on the backend. Of course, the Ducks could just end up scoring 300 goals, so I guess you can win that way too.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
by RudyKelly on Sep 15, 2009 11:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My reply’s the same:
Sure, but they were dead-league-average in terms of GA last year, even with the superstars.
It’s possible that this collection of blueliners and goalies can’t produce league-average GA results again, I suppose, but I’m not ruling out improvement, either. All it would take, theoretically, would be less Giguere throwaway minutes and a less-than-awful PK. I need to see them play some games, though — too many guys made their money on the east coast; there’s still tons of unknowns.
I guess I can maintain some optimism in that I don’t really see how the PK gets much worse than last year — the Ducks gave up the most PPGs in the west, and I don’t think Giguere will be given the same minutes he got last year unless he shows improvement. Results-wise, it’s not like the Ducks were a banner defensive team last year — replicating that GA-rate isn’t an outrageous request, even if none of the guys’ names are Pronger.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well yeah, but shouldn’t it concern you that you were mediocre in goals allowed with Pronger and Beauchemin and Pahlsson and Moen? Just because it wasn’t as good as you hoped doesn’t mean it can’t get worse.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
by RudyKelly on Sep 15, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure it’s a concern, but not much different a concern had all the same players stayed — it needs to be addressed by whoever’s putting on the Ducks uniform.
But it’s not like we’re measuring up to Everest here — if the defense can stay near where it was with all its flaws last year, then I think the offense can pick up the slack.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
- yours truly, until Anaheim Calling gets its act together -
Talked to Mirtle. He implied we are likely experiencing a delay related to the launch of the new homepage. So there are layers of acts in disarray here.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 15, 2009 1:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
[strikethrough emphasis accidentally added]
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 15, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t sweat it — the important thing is that you’re on their to-do list.
And yeah, that should give you time to learn the obnoxiousness of unwanted SBN formatting help. :)
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it might have been funnier of I claimed to have my act together in the same comment that I was victimized by SBN formatting.
Anaheim Calling
http://anaheimcalling.blogspot.com
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Sep 15, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s another tip — never leave an asterisk* in your comment, then plan to reference it at the end.
- Stupid SBN turns it into a bullet point. Thanks, jerks!
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted 6th. I really like a lot of the things the Quackies did this off-season, but they feel oddly Eastern Conference to me right now …
(Note: I honestly didn’t say that to make Sleek’s blood boil. Honest!)
When I'm not battling in California:
Cycle Like The Sedins
by jamestobrien on Sep 15, 2009 8:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
that is a mean thing to say!! ha ha!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 15, 2009 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lupul, Koivu, Artyukhin, Christensen, Nokelainen, Boynton, Sbisa, Eminger, Whitney, Brookbank, and Pogge — all these players played games in the eastern conference last season — that’s probably where that feeling comes from, and don’t worry — I feel it too.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 15, 2009 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad Versus doesn’t agree.
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
by brokenyard on Sep 16, 2009 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
6th - 4th
Then lose to Sharks in 2nd round.
by skilletboy on Sep 15, 2009 9:47 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
-- I can drink Shark tears all day.
Don’t you have to be careful? I thought sharks pee through their skins. Having said that, I need to get to Staples to stock up on “President’s Trophy = First Round Exit?” and “Sharks don’t eat ducks in nature ‘cuz they know they’ll choke!” signs.
by GordonBombay on Sep 16, 2009 6:44 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, with Shark tears, it’s probably best to run them through the Brita filter a few times, and boil ‘em twice. After that, they’re sterile and tasty.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 16, 2009 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so I see the summer of being nice has worn off and it’s back to being hated enemies with the season approaching … :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 16, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t confuse laziness with niceness. But yeah, there’s a meaningful BoC game coming pretty damn soon, I guess I’d better start sharpening the ol’ pitchforks.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 16, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gimme a minute so I can find my air tank and rifle…
by GordonBombay on Sep 16, 2009 12:50 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
“Meaningful”?
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
by brokenyard on Sep 16, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Home opener against the Sharks is worth two points, plus whatever bitterness has survived the summer. That’s soon and meaningful.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 16, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
“Oh”
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
by brokenyard on Sep 16, 2009 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
are you not obsessively looking at the schedules like the rest of us?? :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 16, 2009 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh, I don’t have any clue what Game #2 is, but I do know the Ducks play in Philly somewhere in their first five games.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Sep 16, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have and it still seems oh-so-far-away
Put the Prozac away, what you need is Rat Poison.
by brokenyard on Sep 18, 2009 5:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted 7th. I think there’s going to be some pains with that defense, and at least in the past, I feel most of the Ducks forwards have been pretty decent defensively, balanced across lines at least. Maybe that was just an illusion from being backed up by 2 Norris trophy winners, but at least it felt that way. With Lupul back, less help from the D (presumably), the loss of Pahlsson and others, I think they make the playoffs, but they’ve got to fight for it. Besides, the West is pretty top heavy. Hard to get ahead of VAN, CAL, CHI, DET, SJS (who steps back this season, but not THAT much).
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
by IAmJoe on Sep 18, 2009 8:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 































