Kings Gameday: Let's Talk About This Real Fast
Los Angeles Kings at Columbus Blue Jackets, Jan 28, 2010 4:00 PM PST
So I'm just trying clarify on this whole "Jonathan Quick is our unquestioned #1 starter" thing; we're just going to ignore the fact that he's not that good? I mean, that's fine, I'm used to mediocre goaltending, I just wanted to make sure everyone knew it was a problem.
Quick has started 47 of the Kings' 52 games this season and tonight he'll make it 48 of 53. His traditional numbers are uninspiring: he's 21st in the league in goals against average, 27th in save percentage, and tied for 24th in shutouts. He is tied for 4th in wins, but I like to think that in this day and age I don't have to explain why that's a meaningless measure of a goaltender's worth.
I asked Hawerchuk from the fantastic Behind the Net blog the best way to evaluate a goaltender and he said to look at even-strength save percentage. He thought 4 year's worth was best, but since Quick has only been in the league a year and a half (and also because I'm lazy) I just looked at this year's so far. Quick has a .917 SV% at even stength, which is good for 18th among goalies who have played more than 10 games this season. That doesn't seem that bad, so I was curious to see what was dragging Quick down. It looks like what is dragging Quick down is his penalty kill save percentage, which is only .846, good for 38th in the league. That's not good.
So now the question I have is if penalty kill save percentage is more a factor of luck or if there's something in Quick's playing style that makes him more susceptible to power play goals. I mean, I can see it. The Kings should have a good penalty kill, but they don't (24th overall). Maybe it's Quick's fault. There is a lot of movement on a power play and Quick's biggest problem is staying square to the shooter, so I can see how there might be some flaw in his game. But, on the other hand, maybe the Kings are just getting lucky on the penalty kill. Who knows? I hope they're just unlucky because otherwise that spells trouble for Quick's future.
And I want Quick to do well because I like him. He's only 23 so it's unfair to expect so much from him, but I think the Kings have reached the point where age is no longer a factor. Players can either do their job or they can't. I'm not saying Quick is bad by any means; there is value in having an average goaltender that can play 70 games in a season. And it's not like there's anything the Kings can do about it; they're not going to trade for another goaltender that's any good and they're not going to bring up Bernier when he's leading the Monarchs to the top of their conference. The Kings are still a good defensive team because they back-check well and the defense does a good job of not allowing shots, not because Quick is doing anything special in net. We're going to have Quick for the rest of the year and he's going to give us a league average job in net; I just wish he'd do more.
***
Matt Greene talked about music with Puck Daddy today and expressed his love for blog favorite Hall 'n Oates (we like Oates) and some other band. Give a listen to the one hockey player in the entire NHL that isn't mind-numbingly boring.
***
The last time the Kings played the Columbus Blue Jackets Rob Scuderi did this:
It's funny to think that Scuderi's hit didn't get a penalty for that hit while the Ian White hit on Wayne Simmonds in the Toronto game was apparently worth 2 minutes. Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if Jason Chimera or someone else on the Jackets tried to exact a little justice tonight.
(That game against the Jackets also had my favorite moment of the season so far: after the Kings embarrassed the Jackets to the tune of 6-2, Jason Chimera boarded Alex Frolov and then turned around for the expected fight; instead, the Kings just skated around while Bailey put up his dukes behind the glass. It was surreal.)
UPDATE: I guess Jason Chimera got traded to the Capitals for some reason so I guess Columbus won't really care about Scuderi. Unless they decide to punch him because he has a big nose or something.
***
Mike already linked to it but I'm going to link to it again: this picture is amazing.
Predicition: Kings win, 5-3. Everyone showers Quick with praise for making 20 stops.
102 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Quick down is his penalty kill save percentage, which is only .846, good for 38th in the league
holy shit is that bad…whya rent u guys trying to go get biron, turco, roloson..let quick use the demotion on getting better next year
I usually end up doing somthing stupid...count on it
LONG LIVE BOC (and from the rink)!!
GO DUCKS!!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Jan 28, 2010 11:06 AM PST reply actions
biron, turco, roloson
These guys all suck and aren’t guaranteed to be better than Quick.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
by RudyKelly on Jan 28, 2010 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with you, for the most part. I’ve never really bought into Quick all the way. I was very happy with him last year, but I would have been happy with a cardboard cutout instead of Labs. I saw inconsistancies with Quick’s game last year and chalked it up to him being young. This year that excuse doesn’t go as far. Quick can be very good at times, but he still seems be get himself out of position quite a bit. He’ll be a starter in this league more than a back up, but I’m not sure if he’ll ever be a stud.
As far as the Kings go, I want to see what Bernier can do next year. Have a little healthy competition between him and Quick. Maybe Quick will suprise us and elevate his game when he isn’t guaranteed to start 75 games. My money is on Bernier being the man for the Kings by the end of next year.
Quick doesn’t have great numbers, but he has been far more solid a goaltender than we’ve had in a long time. You have to remember, people reminisce about Potvin and Hrudey, and neither of those guys were that great. Quick is like Hrudey a little bit in that he can make amazing saves on shots he shouldn’t get but then lets in that first goal for the Maple Leafs. I’m all for leaving Bernier down until next season. It’ll be interesting to see how things pan out for him, Carey Price, and Steve Mason during their careers since Price and Mason are already having confidence issues.
…people reminisce about Potvin and Hrudey, and neither of those guys were that great.
Hey, I’m going to punch you in the face.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
Speaking of not so great goaltenders I still remember seeing those “Brust-or-Bust” signs at Kings games in ’07. That was a strange season for the Kings.
by superfan#99 on Jan 28, 2010 12:14 PM PST up reply actions
He was awesome, but not great numbers wise.
I know but you don’t have to say it.
That was a strange season for the Kings.
In retrospect I never should have gotten that “SEAN BURKE 4 LIFE” tattoo.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
Did you really get that tattoo?
Denis Gauthier sucks at hockey... and life.
by Kevin Y on Jan 28, 2010 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Heatly looks creepy – kinda like he just got done looking through a peep hole he drilled in a girls dorm bathroom.
They all look weird… I never really noticed how troll-like Dan Boyle looked until this photo
by AnnihilatorRich on Jan 28, 2010 12:26 PM PST up reply actions
troll like? Boyle??? no way! he’s very do-able … :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin
by ang6666 on Jan 28, 2010 12:51 PM PST up reply actions
Not really a comment on his doability, more so how short and troll-like he looks next to those three
by AnnihilatorRich on Jan 28, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions
Did any of you see the Sharks/Hawks game on NHL Network, because
they had a bit of footage of that photo shoot and it was remarkable to watch Marleau (and all of them really) with those dopey smiles frozen on their faces in real time. I mean, that photo is not just one of those “in reality my face is quite normal, the picture just caught me between expressions.” No, they held those freakish expressions for a minute or more.
Wait till this year.
First off, I really like the work you guys do here. Top notch. Just thought I’d chime in to say that PK save percentage tends to regress hard to about average. I’ve looked at it in the past in terms of the change over one season and it can be pretty drastic. Tyler Dellow has also done some work in this area that I found helpful. I’m pretty sure that one of the reasons Gabe suggested using EV Sv% instead of overall Sv% is to eliminate the high amount of variance you get from PK and PP Sv%. Incidentally, the average goalie is about .870 on the PK.
Kings games average a combined less than 6 goals per game. That means that, since you can’t have a 3-3 score anymore, it’s basically who hits 4 goals first that wins. Only once this season have the Kings won IN REGULATION when allowing 4 goals: the 6-4 win against SJ back in October.
The Kings have scored 5+ goals 13 times this year (no shootouts), and have allowed 5 goals in a game only five times (excluding one shootout). What that means is that more often than not, Quick is better than the other team’s goaltender. That’s all that matters.
The Kings score a lot of goals (they’ve actually scored 5 goals eight times, while scoring 4 goals only seven), so even though Quick’s save percentage or GAA numbers are further away from the league average than you’d like, he still does what he needs to.
The Kings are now 7th in goals scored and 14th in goals allowed, both in the top half of the league, and both better than the league average. And they are 10th in the league in points. So whatever Quick is doing, it’s working.
Who are the best stats goalies in the league? Ryan Miller and Martin Brodeur. Brodeur is 31-16-2, Miller is 28-11-5. Quick is 28-16-3. Not exactly even, but close enough. I usually look at save percentage before any other stat, but you can’t ignore the results. If we had Brodeur, we’d be spectacular. But not that Quick is terrible.
Denis Gauthier sucks at hockey... and life.
Who are the best stats goalies in the league? Ryan Miller and Martin Brodeur. Brodeur is 31-16-2, Miller is 28-11-5. Quick is 28-16-3. Not exactly even, but close enough. I usually look at save percentage before any other stat, but you can’t ignore the results.
He is tied for 4th in wins, but I like to think that in this day and age I don’t have to explain why that’s a meaningless measure of a goaltender’s worth.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
Not to get in a fight with hockey fans everywhere, but Brodeur is overrated. He is definitely a great goalie, but playing in the Devils system and under Jacques Lemaire has had it’s advantages (see also: Niklas Backstrom). I would rate Bryzgalov higher than Brodeur this season.
What are you, retarded?
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
Hey, hey, hey, I specifically requested that you write about a non-King player and their awfulness! What do I have to do, bake you cupcakes and print up a tee shirt that says “Mr. Always Right”?
Sigh. Jon Quick. Pierre LaBrun just praised him, and I think his win total and shootout save percentage (in the land of no rebounds) could mislead some people into thinking he’s been great. Mostly I’m just glad he pulled out of that mental tailspin or whatever it was and that he’s back to being average. Behold the soft bigotry of low expectations. Plus, he looks like a puppy, and I can’t get mad at anyone who looks like he’s only fifteen for very long. (Ersberg is more like eleven.)
That Olympic picture needs more dog.
I prefer my Kool-Aid spiked
you have already started drinking havent you?
I usually end up doing somthing stupid...count on it
LONG LIVE BOC (and from the rink)!!
GO DUCKS!!!
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Jan 28, 2010 4:10 PM PST up reply actions
Big Thunder Mountain!
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
by BoulderDodger on Jan 28, 2010 4:22 PM PST up reply actions
Brown apparently gets “tight when things aren’t going right” haha
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
Get out the checkbook and pay Grandma for the rubdown! GREENE SCORES!!!
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 28, 2010 4:25 PM PST reply actions
Yours does it pro bono?
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 28, 2010 4:26 PM PST up reply actions
I don’t think anything could stop this from being weird.
by 88fingerslukee on Jan 28, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe I’m adopted but nobody bothered to tell me?
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 28, 2010 4:28 PM PST up reply actions
Anybody else have an overwhelming urge to say “Umberger!” like Steve Martin says “hamburger” in Pink Panther whenever they hear his name? No, just me? Ok then.
I was gonna say something about this but I didn’t want to also sound like an asshole. He’s putting it in your eye.
by 88fingerslukee on Jan 28, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions
Especially considering how it started.
by 88fingerslukee on Jan 28, 2010 4:42 PM PST up reply actions
His hair hasn’t moved at all in 20 years.
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 28, 2010 4:59 PM PST up reply actions
I heard Pete Demers is the man to talk to if you need a hookup for antibiotics or some topical cream. Just whatever you do, don’t mention the name “Cy Sperling” while in Pete’s presence.
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 28, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions
This made me think of what Bob tells Jimmy during commercial breaks (For you, speech is a second language)
he's awesome
and pretty damn feisty
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
by BoulderDodger on Jan 28, 2010 5:54 PM PST up reply actions
Duck toy is a good idea. I was going to get a Wild Wing on eBay for my dog to destroy.
I prefer my Kool-Aid spiked
haha brilliant
i like to think he looks up to Bailey
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
by BoulderDodger on Jan 28, 2010 6:00 PM PST up reply actions
excellent reverse jinx
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
by BoulderDodger on Jan 28, 2010 6:04 PM PST up reply actions
haha
thats o’donnells 2nd own goal this week. not that we record such things
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
In that Team Canada photo, Jumbo Joe’s got a mouth that looks like he could eat an apple through a fucking fence
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 28, 2010 6:20 PM PST reply actions
Dear Kings, always promise Kopi the Stay-Pufts.
Well, I must say that was a pleasure. Thank goodness Rudy’s gameday post hex did not work at all! Solid. I don’t usually watch a Kings game and feel so relaxed.
Wooooooo. Night all!
I prefer my Kool-Aid spiked
indeed
outside of the first 10 minutes it was an easy going game for a kings fan.
victory!
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
by BoulderDodger on Jan 28, 2010 6:27 PM PST up reply actions
Quick v. Bernier
Around the time that Quick was promoted over Bernier (12-2008), people were of course comparing the numbers and somehow coming to the conclusion that Quick’s numbers were better. Their goals-against was identical to within 1/100s of a goal; SV% was the stat everyone kept citing. But the problem with Quick and SV% is he gives up about 25% more rebounds than Bernier, so on average something like 6 of his shots are self-generated, rebounds that wouldn’t have existed with Bernier.
Now, I think Quick has improved marginally in the rebound department, which had better be true, because otherwise his fairly ungood SV% numbers have to be even further down-graded because he’s the cause of a quarter of those shots.
The other thing that I find interesting: theres a site (hockey numbers, I think it’s called) that breaks down SV% by difficult, average and easy shots (don’t ask me how). Quick is near the bottom of the league in hard and average shots, but stellar on easy shots (98% — that’s actually better than most goalies, all but about five of them).
Maybe the people categorizing the shot quality are insane. My own feeling is that Quick is great on the difficult shots. I don’t know.
I like him anyway. (maybe because in the beginning of the season he tended to play bad in wins and good in losses so I didn’t care; i.e. he wasn’t losing us games…and I don’t think he’s lost us more than one or two all year.)
But I also have been from the start of the year an advocate of bringing up JB and trading EE. He’s going to be our 1A or 1B next year anyway. And if QUick gets hurt, there isn’t a chance in hell we’re going to hand the reigns to Ersberg. DL would promote Bernier and EE would still sit. So why are they being so coy?
Wait till this year.
oh, and I meant to say
causing six shots per game means you’re causing about two goals every three games, and that’s not good. but like I said, I assume his rebound control is better. so maybe I am to be ignored.
Wait till this year.
I don’t put much stock in shot difficulty, but I think the reason you feel Quick is great on difficult shots is because he makes shots look harder than they should be. He’ll stretch to make a glove save instead of sliding over and taking the shot to the chest. I fall for it too.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
Quick is definitely high end on difficult shots. Not so much Roy butt humpery (shot goes in glove, arm swings wildly) but Mike Richter (split slide across on two on ones)
by Nut on Jan 28, 2010 9:53 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
one of the nice "intangibles" about Quick, and it may be the single biggest factor in his favor
is that he doesn’t appear to be mentally ill. he’s like alec baldwin in “State and Main” when he flips the car with the drunk under-aged girl in it and he crawls from the wreck, surveys the scene and says, “okay, that happened.”
bernier, by all reports, is more in that dickhead hextall/belfour mold. which is why they ought to be a good tandem and why I can’t wait. (also, bernier is technically beautiful re positioning, conservation of movement, rebound control — he has the power to just piss you off, like Craig Ludwig’s shin pads.)
Wait till this year.
he doesn’t appear to be mentally ill
This made me laugh out loud, because yeah, that needs to be discussed more often! It’s good that he seems to have regained his calm (singing along to songs helps?). But of course, if Bernier keeps it together save-wise, he can talk to posts and punch out other goalies all he wants. Being out there the whole game does weird things to you.
I prefer my Kool-Aid spiked
Good thing you told me about this tonight.
Otherwise I might of believed my eyes. Jesus Christ, his name is “Quick” for fuck’s sake what more do you want? Its worth the psychological advantage alone. All of your stats cited are defense dependent. Even over four years, if the defense sucked for four years it would be meaningless. This year is the first year I can remember the Kings having something that could be pointed to and called a “defense”.

by 






















