Maple Swap: Thank you, Poppa Burke!

I might as well use the same image I used the day Giguere signed his four-year deal.

Item: Former Duck J.S. Giguere gets traded to Toronto for former King Jason Blake and former Shark Vesa Toskala -- a BoC memorial trade of sorts.  See also: Anaheim Calling, Pension Plan Puppets.

For reference, here's what I said a couple of weeks ago for a Blackhawks Q&A:

How does this Giguere-Hiller problem get solved?

I don't think it does -- nobody's sucker enough to take J.S. Giguere's contract off our books (well, I haven't entirely given up on Brian Burke yet).

Well look at me, Mr. Smarty-Pants.  I'm going to offer a quick look at why I love this deal in today's rushed post, and have some more thorough thoughts for tomorrow's gameday.  Read on, if you care dare.

J.S. Giguere has had a tremendous career in Anaheim, but he was going to be a huge monetary problem next season for the Ducks -- $7 million that was going to be spent essentially on the bench.  Here's the salary cap list for 2010-11 that I made a few posts ago (all numbers courtesy of CapGeek) -- the "Before" picture:


Now here's the "After" picture, including the Hiller extension and Giguere trade:


As I noted in that previous cap-discussion post, for Anaheim the "Cash" figure matters much more than the "Cap" figure, and you can see how that's worked out fantastically -- for only an additional half-million dollars in cash, the Ducks now have a much better goalie in net, an additional scoring forward, and virtually no money being wasted on the bench (we shall see if Toskala gets any offer next summer from Anaheim; I'm in favor of trying out some Timo Pielmeier myself).

And I don't even care that Jason Blake is overpaid (if that even proves true) -- he's got two more years on a deal that has an annual cap hit of $4M but in cash costs only $3M/yr.  In my mind, it's way better to spend money (even on overpayments) on the ice than watching it sit on the bench; an additional J-Blake improves next year's team much more than an idle Giguere.

And I don't even care that Vesa Toskala may be awful -- all he has to do is occupy Giguere's seat on the bench, I think -- any actual performance out of the guy this season is pure bonus in my mind.

Bottom line: It's early, but I like this deal a lot for the Ducks; in fact, I liked it in the incorrect version I heard earlier in the day, where the Ducks also threw in a first-round draft pick -- I think that'd be a stomachable price to unload the hefty next-year-salary of J.S. Giguere.  Now instead of spending $7M off the ice, the Ducks get to spend $7.5M on the ice, and I think on paper it makes for a much better starting point for 2010-11. 

Now the summer priorities seem to be: Bobby Ryan needs his raise, Wisniewski and Chipchura need to get penciled in, Selanne-Koivu-Niedermayer need to make up their minds, and I think the Ducks still might find a little money to spend -- should be a fairly exciting summer.

Good job, Barstool Bob -- way to get out of that $11.5M goalie overcommitment for next season.  And good job, Brian Burke -- when you departed Anaheim, I had a list of three criticisms about your Anaheim GM legacy -- and today, you're down to only two!  If only there were some way you could have somehow also traded for the Bertuzzi buyout payments too...  :)

More Giguere trade thoughts coming tomorrow.  Go Ducks.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Battle of California

You must be a member of Battle of California to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Battle of California. You should read them.

Join Battle of California

You must be a member of Battle of California to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Battle of California. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.