Ducks Gameday -- So long, Cotton Gin
Anaheim Ducks (30-26-7, t-12th in west) at Phoenix Coyotes (38-22-5, 3rd in west), 5 pm
Anaheim Calling and Five For Howling -- what a network-y age we live in!
Today's the day when I try to properly bid farewell to Ryan Whitney, and I tell you -- it's a bit tricky. Ducks fans who have lived through Cotton Gin's turnovers and soft defense are of course thrilled to see the big guy gone, and I'm ecstatic as an incoming-Lubo fan (salary cap analysis here), but it's difficult to peg exactly how big a problem Ryan Whitney really was for the Ducks.
The thing about watching Ryan Whitney play is that mostly what you end up noticing is what isn't there -- he's never quite the sum of his parts. Sure he's a hulking 6'4" but he doesn't really hit anyone. NHL.com might tell you that he's thrown 71 hits for the Ducks this season, but they aren't noticeable -- he's a pokecheck-first kind of guy with a lot of reach. And yes, while he does seem offensively-positioned and does shoot pucks towards the net, but they never seem really threatening or dangerous, and frequently can come the other direction. His decision-making is sometimes suspect, and when he gets caught flat-footed in the wrong spot, he really gets caught -- he has taken more minor penalties than anyone not named Getzlaf or Perry (sigh -- hate that they're the standard).
Speaking of Perry, here's the last moment Ducks fans will remember of Ryan Whitney playing hockey while under a Ducks paycheck:

Ryan Whitney played only 2:57 of the gold medal game -- I'm guessing this was his final shift.
Despite his glaring giveaways, though, it really hasn't been all bad for the Cotton Gin -- five games into the season when everybody was bleeding on the shot chart, Whitney was one guy doing pretty well. He was outscoring opponents 5-1 and only getting outshot by two shots at even-strength (Scott Niedermayer, by comparison, was being outshot by 29 shots at the time). When I looked in December about who was partnering well with Niedermayer at even-strength, Cotton Gin again did pretty well -- he wasn't responsible for the bulk of the captain's minuses or negative Corsi.
And in looking over Whitney's season this morning, there's one stretch of games that really caught my eye -- I really don't know what to make of it. For a one month stretch, from December 29 through January 27, Whitney played 16 games, had zero points, and was a minus-13. If you can find a way to explain away those 16 games, Whitney's numbers suddenly look very impressive: 46 games played, 28 points (13 on the power play), and a plus-seven.
So WTF happened in that suck month? Not sure, but a closer look after the jump.
I went to Vic Ferrari's timeonice.com site to dig in a little deeper -- there you can segment games according to date range. Here's how Whitney's 5-on-5 on-ice shooting numbers looked before the bad month, during it, and afterwards. Note that these results exclude empty nets.
Ryan Whitney's Even-Strength Shooting Results this season
| Date Segment |
Games Played |
Goals For |
Goals Against |
Goal Differential |
Shots For |
Shots Against |
Shot Pct. |
Attempted Shots For |
Attempted Shots Against |
Corsi Pct. |
| before Dec. 29 | 38 | +36 | -27 | +9 | 352 | 366 | .490 | 632 | 639 | .497 |
| Dec. 29 - Jan. 27 | 16 | +5 | -15 | -10 | 107 | 170 | .386 | 191 | 308 | .383 |
| after Jan. 27 | 8 | +10 | -4 | +6 | 65 | 86 | .430 | 122 | 158 | .436 |
It's really quite an amazing dip there in the second row, and I can't find anybody else to blame except Whitney -- six other defensemen played for the Ducks over that one-month stretch, and I checked them all. All had worse goal differentials, shot percentages, and corsi percentages when paired with Whitney than when paired with somebody else. Cotton Gin was the suck, and this doesn't even consider his zero points on the man-advantage during that month, either.
So really, I think there's two main questions here: (a) What the fuck happened to Cotton Gin at the end of December and why did it hurt his numbers so? Could it really have been pressure to make (and break) Team USA? Is there a way to explain the awfulness away? (b) If so, then what sort of player do the Oilers have in Ryan Whitney going forward? He's obviously not as awful as that one month, but it's not fair to outright exclude those results as just a statistical hiccup, either -- his post-slump numbers haven't fully recovered to his early season rates.
I really have no answers here -- I'll open it up to theories in the comments. But I think the point remains: Ducks fans may be glad as hell to see Whitney gone, and certainly that can be justified by the fact that Cotton Gin played an awful month of hockey in the middle of a battling season, but the fact remains -- the guy still contributes. The price of quality defensemen always seems to climb in this league, and Whitney could prove quite the bargain for Edmonton before this trade is played out. We all know he has the tools, he may someday soon be the sum of his parts, but even so -- Ducks need wins today, and he's not there yet.
Godspeed, Cotton Gin. You had your flaws, you made us curse a bunch, and we made fun of your Olympic blog and Team USA performance, but no matter what, you did eliminate the Sharks -- that makes you unequivocally awesome in my book.
Prediction: LUBO!
Go Ducks.
0 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
No theory but
I took a look at the shift charts. The Dallas New Year’s game and the Predators game were the last of the Whitney/Brookbank pairing, which seemed pretty successful behind a hot line. Then the 5-2 loss against the Blackhawks was the one-night only return of the unsuccessful Whitney/Wisniewski pairing.
After that, it was the birth of Whitney/Eminger. The team was successful for that run, with two awful pac losses and two bad losses in the East, but otherwise winning. Still, just looking at their charts, both Whtiney and Eminger seemed to be on the ice for every goal and every penalty of every game. Obviously, Whitney picked up extra shifts here and there with Brookbank, Niedermayer and Wisniewski, but after looking at the charts, I’m really surprised that Eminger’s numbers in that same month would be so much better.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Mar 6, 2010 1:33 PM PST reply actions
Yeah, it struck me as Whitney-Eminger, too — they were most frequently partners. But when separated, Eminger succeeded. Whitney, for the short term at least, kept bleeding.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Mar 6, 2010 3:13 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
seems strange that eminger would succeed, though. When I ran the numbers on his time with Niedermayer to open the season, he was pretty bad, though I’m sure the corsi would be decent on that top line. Whitney was about 50% of his shifts, 15% with Niedermayer on the top and 15% with Mikkelson on the third. I was surprised to hear that he was so much better in that 30% than in the 50, because he’s seemed to have growing pains on every pairing until he found a snarling, sneaking down below the hash marks groove on the second pairing.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Mar 6, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions
Heh, I remember the first game of the season where we gave Whitney three assists or whatever for Sharks goals. That guy was pretty shitty.
Lubo’s going to transform that power play, and it’s not even like the Ducks need a whole lot of help there. Scary.
"San Jose is where I want to be at the end of the day, and there's an opportunity now to make it there. It is where my heart is." - Jamie McGinn, 2/22/10
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
To varying extremes, you’ll find these kinds of fluctuations in a lot of players. Players nurse injuries that we never hear about, and mental fatigue is a factor as well. Whitney going 0-for-16 games isn’t that far out of the realm of possibility, and it’s not like his numbers outside of that slump are tremendous. They’re good, not great.
Additionally, Whitney is the kind of player with obvious strengths and weakness that would allow him to look good one game and awful the next. I think that type of player’s performance relies on how well a team is in position to exploit their strengths and mask their weaknesses. On this current Ducks team, with Scotty not up to his usual standard, there wasn’t any place to hide Cotton Gin’s defensive deficiencies. The same may wind up holding true for Lubo.
Yeah, and it’s not so much the points production — I’m OK with slumps there, but he was getting outscored a ton. Sixteen straight games where he was a “plus” player only once, but the -13 probably suggests that.
It’s more the month of bleeding, goals-wise and shots-wise, that seems to really have especially sullied his year.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
I’d say that it’s dirty to use the same “Godspeed” that Rudy used in his legendary breakup post in 2008.
I’m sure Rudy stole that from somewhere, too. OK, happy hunting, then.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Mar 6, 2010 3:15 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
but no matter what, you did eliminate the Sharks — that makes you unequivocally awesome in my book.
You suck.
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin
by ang6666 on Mar 6, 2010 2:36 PM PST reply actions
Woo! Last place taunting!
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Mar 6, 2010 3:16 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
well with how the Stars are playing lately, maybe you won’t stay in last place long … :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin
by ang6666 on Mar 6, 2010 5:02 PM PST up reply actions
Won’t be here tonight, but I hope this game is everything I hope it is.
Go Drinks!
"You know? I might not be wealthy or cool or even intelligent," I said to myself. Then I felt like there was more to that sentence, but I guess there wasn’t.
Looks like no Festerling tonight — we’ll have some mix of Niedermayer, Visnovsky, Wisniewski, Eminger, Brookbank, and Ward.
McE has made it in time to be backup, I’m pretty sure.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
This game is like a power play shootout, except back in the first year when we especially sucked at shootouts.
C’mon, kill.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
Another Olympic collision. I don’t know that an outsider would sense any sort of unusual desperation to tonight’s game — three shots on goal so far this period.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
Ducks power plays no longer to be referred to as “man advantages”. Now they are just “man discrepancies”.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
Visnosky's deflecting own goals?
Oh, he’ll fit right in here
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Mar 6, 2010 7:25 PM PST reply actions
Heh. We know where Lubo’s loyalties still lie.
Go Slovakian Secret Agent!
2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Mar 7, 2010 1:54 PM PST up reply actions
yay 4-0 loss…art of suicide picture post requested please…
Im a son of a bitch...I think
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Mar 7, 2010 9:38 AM PST reply actions

by 




























