Hockey and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
I got an e-mail the other day from someone named Chelsea Travers, who I assume isn't really a BoC reader, but still did want to use this blog to spread awareness about TBI -- traumatic brain injury. I'm not really one to speak about this -- here's Chelsea (complete with her own hyperlink codes -- nice!):
Author Bio: Chelsea Travers is an outreach representative for CareMeridian, a subacute care facility located throughout the Western United States for patients suffering from traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury or medical complexities, such as neuromuscular or congenital anomalies.
Hockey and TBI
Hockey is arguably one of the most physical professional sports. Hockey players are constantly getting body checked, slammed into boards, falling to the ice, slapped by a stick, hit by a dense, speeding puck or getting punched during a fight. If that isn’t bad enough, hockey players take part in one of the longest regular seasons of any sport, effectively taking on harsher pain for a longer amount of time throughout the year. Risk of injury couldn’t be clearer as you all too commonly see hockey players missing their front two teeth. With all of the injuries that can occur, one of the most dangerous is a traumatic brain injury (TBI). A TBI is a silent injury that can cause harm to the mind and body of an individual. An injury to the head or brain can alter someone’s life and can even require long-term rehabilitation and care from a skilled nursing facility. These injuries are often far too common in the sport of hockey and if not properly treated can permanently leave a hockey player's life challenging than the game they play.
TBI is an injury that Philadelphia Flyers player Ian Laperriere knows all too well. In game 5 of an NHL playoff game with the New Jersey Devils, Laperriere took a slap shot to the face that immediately caused him to bleed excessively from the wound above his eye and lose sight. Laperriere was diagnosed with a brain contusion after having a MRI a few days later. While Laperriere may have originally thought that losing sight in one of his eyes was the worst of the two injuries, in reality the bigger concern could wind up being the long-term effects of the brain injury.
A concussions have been dismissed as minor injuries because the physical nature of most sports causes them to occur regularly, but, frequently occurring or not, they are still head injuries where the brain is forced to move violently within the skull and the way it functions could change permanently. When the brain moves in such a manner, it can bruise, bleed, and even tear, which can cause irreversible damage to the victim. For a sport like hockey, this type of injury is very common and unfortunately at times ignored. Many hockey players don't take into account the possible effects of the injury and because it might not seem like a serious problem exists at first, they keep on skating as if nothing occurred. Their unawareness of the injury makes the it so much more dangerous because a mild brain injury can turn into a life threatening injury in a very short period of time without seeking immediate medical treatment.
Studies by the National Academy of Neuropsychology's Sports Concussion Symposium in New York have shown that since 1997, 759 NHL players have been diagnosed with a concussion. Broken down, that averages out to 76 players per season and 31 concussions per 1,000 games of hockey. That is far too frequent of an occurrence for such a serious injury. It's a frightening statistic that should send up a red flag to hockey officials that actions need to be taken to further prevent this type of injury from occurring.
The best, and sometimes only, treatment for TBI is prevention. For the National Hockey League new rules are being considered that preserve the game but also help protect the players. Rule changes concerning blindside hits, rink size (which affects players' space from each other and their proximity to walls), and stronger helmet requirements all have been considered to help curb TBI and its effects. This demonstrates that the NHL is aware of the seriousness of the injury and is taking proactive steps to help prevent it from happening.
Hockey is one of the most popular sports in North America and has millions of people participating in it every year. Unfortunately, the sport comes with the risk of a TBI. With the right awareness of the injury and the necessary precautions in place, the game should be able to continue with players excited to lace up their skates and enjoy it.
I think that there's some excellent points here, though of course we're in an awfully fuzzy phase of "what will non-concussion hockey look like?" Slower? Less hitting? Less fighting? Because that has to be a consideration in this discussion -- there's a spectator angle of safety-issue changes that needs to be covered, too.
Now I'm not saying that I want entertainment no matter the cost -- Chelsea is certainly taking the right step in putting up danger flags about the sport that we enjoy. But I guess that's going to be my question for the comments -- what parts of today's game will be tough to give up in the name of player safety? Or is it possible to play essentially the same sport in a more brain-safety-minded way?
So FWIW, that's BoC's PSA for TBI awareness -- I'm stunned that we've become a channel for anybody trying to say something serious and sincere, but we live in crazy times, I guess.
Go brain science.
14 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I got this e-mail as well. My mom’s also a nurse in a head trauma hospital. This stuff scares me
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on May 13, 2010 6:18 PM PDT reply actions
There's only so much that can be done.
I think the new rules regarding blind-side hits should help to alleviate some of the risk of concussions. But to be honest there will always be a risk that someone could take a bad fall and end up with a brain hemorrhage from a complete accident. Hockey is a dangerous sport but the athletes that play the game know the risks and adapt.
That said there is one further measure that can be taken to reduce the risk – take Matt Cooke out behind the barn and put a bullet in his head. Instantaneous risk reduction!
Realistically, the helmets the players wear are woefully inadequate
I think it’s time to stop with the single-layer-of-foam-inside-a-tupperware helmets and graduate to properly researched kevlar/carbon fiber helmets with three or four different density foams and realistic, effective chin straps and retention devices. It’s crazy that players lose their helmets, crazier that they’re allowed to continue play without them, and crazier still that they’re not required to wear cages, or at least visors.
Look, I follow college hockey, and most people think college hockey sucks. But I like it when a puck caroms off a players cage and it doesn’t take him out of the game/season/career, and I really don’t think the NHL stands to lose anything but injuries if they force cages on the players. The players/fans whined about helmets, and they’ll whine about cages, but losing a marquee player to a preventable facial injury seems like a way bigger problem.
I play goalie, and my mask cost more than twice as much as any other piece of equipment I wear. Players will always choose the lightest and least obstructive headwear, so manufacturers need to concentrate on making high quality helmets which focus on injury prevention and allow the technology to mature and make the helmets desirable from a players standpoint. In the interim, the league needs to force players to wear reasonable helmets.
http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.
I’ve gotta agree with this. Helmets need to be better.
As far as college hockey sucking… yeah, I think it sucks too, but not because of the cages. It’s more because the actual quality of hockey just isn’t as good. It still surprises me that no one in the NHL wears a full mask yet (unless an injury has occurred), especially since all the new players have essentially been wearing them at all levels of play before they went pro.
This is the best helmet I've seen
http://www.cascadeicehockey.com/
Designed to fit to the head better (part of the problem is helmets just sit on players heads and don’t ‘fit’ to them. And it provides additional impact dampening.
"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda
Yeah, the Messier helmet is definitely the best
But I think that it’s still lagging behind what’s already technologically and economically feasible.
http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.
by Carl Johnson on May 16, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
My freshy year in HS Cascade came out with the safest helmet in lacrosse, and our coach made those helmets mandatory for my team. You’d figure the organizations would do more, seeing as they lose money both on player contracts and medical bills, as well as a suffering product on the ice.
UNRELATED: Handel is the most overrated composer ever...
by Bleys on May 18, 2010 11:59 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Hockey players won’t even wear visors, you try to get them to wear some bulky ass helmet. Hell, Selanne still wears that old Jofa helmet during international competitions and that thing barely has any foam. Hockey players are dumb.
The West Coast is the Best Coast.
Of all the blogs on SB Nation, this one is probably the most familiar with traumatic brain injuries. How else do you explain our readers and our writers?
The curse shall be ended.
Battle of California
by Megalodon on May 15, 2010 10:18 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Got this email too
I assumed it was spam since to got sent to both blogs and I haven’t touched the blogspot on since we moved to Bloguin.
resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Lightning is seven times as hot as the surface of the sun.
That’s still not as hot as Douglas Murray. -mymclife
"No, That's Not General Malaise, It's NHL Playoff Fever." Real Fake Sports

by 






















