Kings Gameday: Shots Shots Shots
At this point, I'm hoping that if I keep bringing up how poorly the Kings' shooting luck has been, eventually it'll go away. So let's try this:
-Goaltenders facing the Kings currently have a .941 save percentage when at even strength.* That's like the Kings are going up against Tim Thomas & Tuuka Rask every single time they play a game. That's the highest in the league by a tenth. If that held (it won't, but if it did), it'd be the worst save percentage since Behind the Net started tracking it by about a tenth.
*Hearty thanks to Gabe Desjardins for not only pointing me in the right direction but also for not calling me and everyone else a moron. He's like Stats Buddha, forsaking True Enlightenment to explain to everyone what CORSI is.
-On the power play, the Kings have the 4th highest save percentage against in the league, behind the Canadiens, Sharks*, and Blue Jackets.
*There you go, Meg.
-The Kings have the worst shooting percentage in the league, at 6.7% Remember when I pointed out the dip in points of the Kings' best players, then noted how low their shooting percentage was compared to previous seasons? Since then, the Kings have gone 6-1-3 and their shooting percentage has actually gone down. Just... what? Why?
-If the Kings shot as poorly as the 29th worst shooting team in the league (the Columbus Blue Jackets at 7.5%), they'd have about 9 more goals this season (~93 to 84). That translates to somewhere between 2 and 3 additional wins.
-Luckily, the Kings bad luck shooting has been counter-balanced by the good luck Jonathan Quick has been having. I'm almost inclined to believe his save percentage jump at even strength this season is legit (.921 last year versus .931 this year), but he's currently saving shots when short-handed at a higher clip than at when even strength (.933 to .931). That's going to fall quite a bit, probably right when the Kings' power play heats up. Jonathan Bernier has been way underperforming, though, so I imagine he and Quick's numbers will start trending towards one another.
-So... shit, I guess. Frequent Jewels From The Crown commenter and giant nerd stats enthusiast Rick Knickle has just started up a blog pointing out a lot of fancy (and legitimate) reasons the Kings are going to get better: Fenwick, PDO, all that jazz. I look at this stuff after almost every game to remind myself, "The Kings are good, it's bad luck, things will change," because otherwise it's so easy to start blaming people. I want to blame Anze Kopitar for not shooting on that 2-on-1 in overtime or Trevor Lewis for not burying his set-up in the 2nd period or Dustin Penner for being all Penner-y but I know I shouldn't. I want so badly to pin this on someone, especially Jack Johnson, but it's not true or fair. I can only look at the numbers and know that someday, somehow, it'll be OK.
Or maybe it doesn't. ...Fuck.
Thomas Hickey made it to the AHL All-Star Team! Hooray! Good job, Thomas!
(Jeff Zatkoff did too but who gives a shit.)
***
I was watching the highlights of the Kings-Canucks game the other day and HOLY SHIT THIS PASS:
I mean, I know Kevin Bieksa probably yelled to Henrik Sedin and that's how he knew to drop into that area, but still: holy shit. That's fucking incredible. I wasn't even mad, just impressed. Of course, knowing in advance that the Kings kicked the Canucks' ass the rest of the game helped. Still, well done, Henrik. It's almost like you're good at hockey or something.
Prediction: Kings win, 1,000-1, and move all the way up to 28th in shooting percentage.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How many teams with above-average shooting percentages missed the playoffs last season?
How do you tell the difference between a team that has a bad shooting percentage because they are bad at hockey and a good team that has just been unlucky so far? Shot totals?
Do you think it is possible that certain coaching strategies/power play configurations/whatever can translate directly into lower shooting percentages? Could that be a problem for the Kings?
Once again I find it necessary to point out that I’m not being a dick or trying to start an argument, I just think these questions are interesting.
President of the Brent Burns Robotic Sex-Pants Fan Club.
Battle of California
Kings EV S% Against, Last 4 Years
2011-12: .941 (30th)
2010-11: .915 (10th)
2009-10: .915 (9th)
2008-09 .928 (27th)
Kings PP S% Against, Last 4 Years
2011-12: .915 (27th)
2010-11: .894 (25th)
2009-10: .854 (2nd)
2008-09: .873 (14th)
Some other teams:
SJ EV S% Against/PP S% Against, Last 4 Years
2011-12: .921/.922 (21st/29th)
2010-11: .924/.886 (25th/18th)
2009-10: .909 /.869 (5th/9th)
2008-09: .928/.850 (28th/3rd)
DET EV S% Against/PP S% Against, Last 4 Years
2011-12: .905/.882 (5th/17th)
2010-11: .918/.860 (18th/3rd)
2009-10: .928/.888 (29th/24th)
2008-09: .916/.856 (14th/6th)
VAN EV S% Against/PP S% Against, Last 4 Years
2011-12: .909/.854 (8th/5th)
2010-11: .913/.834 (7th/1st)
2009-10:.902/.865 (2nd/5th)
2008-09: .904/.884 (4th/22nd)
BOS EV S% Against/PP S% Against, Last 4 Years
2011-12: .896/.843 (1st/3rd)
2010-11: .913/.903 (4th/26th)
2009-10: .931/.887 (30th/23rd)
2008-09: .903/.853 (2nd/4th)
The only teams to finish in either the top 10 or bottom 10 in even strength shooting percentage all 4 years are the Canucks (top 10) and the Islanders (bottom 10). Boston was in the top 10 3 times… but then finished last in 2009. San Jose was in the bottom 10 3 times… but then finished 5th in 2009. Pittsburgh and the Kings were in the top 10 and bottom 10 two times each.
Do you think it is possible that certain coaching strategies/power play configurations/whatever can translate directly into lower shooting percentages? Could that be a problem for the Kings?
I think teams like the Canucks emphasize getting the pucks to high shooting areas while teams like the Kings & Sharks emphasize getting the puck on net and hunting for rebounds, which might affect their base shooting percentage. That doesn’t mean both strategies are not prone to bad luck, though.
by RudyKelly on Jan 5, 2012 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
some pretty indispensible articles on this topic:
http://objectivenhl.blogspot.com/2009/02/even-strength-shooting-percentage.html
http://drivingplay.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-much-of-shooting-percentage-is.html
theannoyingpeasant.com
awesome post! Mainly awesome though because you linked my blog (juuust kidding).
theannoyingpeasant.com
YOUR NOT KIDDING
Niles: You'll see who feels foolish when I'm sitting on a mechanical bull sipping champagne.
www.battleofcali.com
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Jan 5, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions
I totally just mentioned opposing goalies SV% against the Sharks on FTF
Now they think I’m all smart even though you did all the work. Thanks!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by RudyKelly on Jan 5, 2012 9:58 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Goaltenders facing the Kings currently have a .941 save percentage when at even strength.
Aww I coulda showed you that if you asked.
It’s a wonderful sort of depressing.
Dinglebarnin' It JftC
Naturally, it is now .943
we’re so good, we regress away from the mean!
by HailRover on Jan 6, 2012 12:15 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
“The Kings are good, it’s bad luck, things will change,”
Also a theme of my posts. Pfft. Whatever, someone will read them someday.
Dinglebarnin' It JftC
I read them. :-) I find them reassuring. “Water seeks its own level,” as the saying goes.
As I read Rudy’s post, I was thinking that you two should sing it as a duet. :-)
"I think you just outed yourself as Dean Lombardi. I knew it all along." — Rudy Kelly
by DougX on Jan 6, 2012 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
So, remember when Quick first came up and he sucked? Then the next season he was real good? I waited all season for him to turn into his sucky self and it still hasn’t happened. :( I think he needs to start receiving the respect he deserves.
So, remember when Quick first came up and he sucked?
That’s based on an awfully small sample size, basically you’re talking about the 3-game cup of coffee that he had in 07-08. The next season, he bumped off LaBarbara as the starter and his season GAA has never been below 2.50, or his SV% below .910 since then. There was never any “sucky self” for him to revert to.
"I think you just outed yourself as Dean Lombardi. I knew it all along." — Rudy Kelly
You mean above 2.50. I can’t even take the rest of your post seriously after that dumb remark.
Yes, true. But the numbers don’t lie. Between the two of us, I’m not the one who’s being a fucking moron.
"I think you just outed yourself as Dean Lombardi. I knew it all along." — Rudy Kelly
by DougX on Jan 6, 2012 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs

by 























