Pushing Parallels

Off_to_slay_the_devils_probably_medium
In honor of L.A.'s success, today's cartoon is drawn using a "Quick Penner" method.

The L.A. Kings, after finishing off a 95-point regular season, have pulled off quite a series of upsets through the first three rounds of these playoffs. They've amassed a 12-2 playoff record while disposing of the western conference's two best teams along with another team that finished just ahead of them in the standings. Now they just have to manage a lengthy break while the New Jersey Devils finish up their eastern conference finals series.

Here's a similar story for those interested in repetition: The 2003 Mighty Ducks of Anaheim, after finishing up a 95-point regular season, pulled off quite a series of upsets through the first three rounds of the playoffs. They amassed a 12-2 playoff record while disposing of the western conference's two best teams along with another team that finished just ahead of them in the standings. Then they had to manage a lengthy break while the New Jersey Devils finished up their eastern conference finals series.

2002-03 Ducks (95 pts) 2011-12 Kings (95 pts)
Round 1 Opponent DET (110 pts) -- ANA wins 4-0 VAN (111 pts) -- LAK wins 4-1
Round 2 Opponent DAL (111 pts) -- ANA wins 4-2 STL (109 pts) -- LAK wins 4-0
Round 3 Opponent MIN (95 pts) -- ANA wins 4-0 PHX (97 pts) -- LAK wins 4-1
Opponent Totals 316 combined points
ANA wins 12-2
317 combined points
LAK wins 12-2

"All of this has happened before and will happen again."

Now I don't want to overplay the mirrored storyline too much -- each of these teams is upsetting favorites in their own special way -- but I do think I have some sense of the cloud of bizarre joy that Kings fans are sitting on right now. That spring of 2003 was beyond magical. Words don't quite capture it, but the universe drips of awesomeness when things are consistently going your way.

Enjoy the hell out of it, Kings fans.

One difference I wanted to highlight, mostly for selfish reasons, is a goaltending comparison between 2003's J.S. Giguere through three rounds of the playoffs and 2012's Jonathan Quick -- here's a look-see:

Through 3 Rounds Record SA GA Minutes GAA Sv Pct OT Minutes OT Saves
J.S. Giguere 2003 12-2 496 20 981 1.22 0.960 161 91
Jonathan Quick 2012 12-2 406 22 858 1.54 0.946 22 8

Both teams have relied on their money goalies, and both delivered very admirably, but there's still a pretty significant difference in their stats -- it's really tough to move from Quick's numbers to Giguere's numbers. To match Giguere's 3-round GAA, Quick would have to play an additional 221 minutes of shutout hockey -- more than 3 1/2 regulations. In order to match Giguere's 3-round save percentage, Quick would have to stop the next 140 shots-against.

Plus Giguere played behind a less potent offense; the Kings through 3 rounds scored 41 goals-for; the Mighty Ducks through 3 rounds scored 33 goals-for. In terms of a per-60-minutes rate, the Kings scored 2.85 GF/60 compared to Anaheim's 1.97 GF/60; the '12 Kings' playoff scoring rate is roughly 144% that of the '03 Mighty Ducks.

And the key difference may be overtimes -- neither goalie lost a sudden-death game, but Giguere played a lot more of bonus-time hockey and made a lot more decision-saving saves.

But hey -- these differences aren't truly meaningful, except that Quick probably doesn't win a Conn Smythe if the Kings bow out next round. No matter what the table says, Jonathan Quick has been exactly the goalie that the Kings needed this postseason.

* * *

So, no real strong point I'm trying to make here -- I don't want to trivialize what the Kings have done, nor am I really implying that they are doomed to follow the '03 Mighty Ducks' tragic SCF fate (though if they do, expect L.A. to win a cup four years and one lockout from now). But it is kind of eerie how similar this bottom-seed-kicking-ass story feels, and I know from my experience it's pretty goddamn spectacular.

Really, the only point I want to make is: it's a rotten time of year to be a Sharks fan. But then again, it always is. :)

Go parallelism.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Battle of California

You must be a member of Battle of California to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Battle of California. You should read them.

Join Battle of California

You must be a member of Battle of California to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Battle of California. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker